DOGE Productiveness E-mail: Businesses Saying Employee Response Not Required

• The Workplace of Personnel Administration requested federal employees to electronic mail an inventory of their accomplishments over the previous week.
• A lot of federal companies informed their staff that they weren’t required to reply.
• Some companies mentioned a response is voluntary, whereas others mentioned they’d reply on staff’ behalf.

Some federal companies’ response to Elon Musk’s employee productiveness electronic mail: thanks, however no thanks.

A rising variety of companies are telling their employees that they aren’t required to reply to the e-mail despatched from the Workplace of Personnel Administration over the weekend asking for an inventory of accomplishments from the previous week.

In response to emails reviewed by Enterprise Insider, among the companies informed staff that they’d reply to OPM on their behalf. Others mentioned a response is voluntary, and failure to reply won’t lead to any penalties.

In a publish on X on Saturday, Musk mentioned that “failure to reply can be taken as a resignation,” however the preliminary electronic mail did not make the identical declare. This comes after a tumultuous previous few weeks for federal employees; plenty of companies terminated 1000’s of staff final week following instructions from President Donald Trump and Musk’s DOGE to slash authorities waste.

These are the federal companies BI has verified which have to this point informed their employees that they don’t want to reply to OPM’s electronic mail forward of the 11:59 p.m. Japanese time deadline on Monday evening.

Division of Protection

The Division of Protection posted on X on Sunday that its staff ought to “pause any response” to the OPM’s electronic mail.

“The Division of Protection is chargeable for reviewing the efficiency of its personnel and it’ll conduct any assessment in accordance with its personal procedures,” the assertion mentioned.

Social Safety Administration

On Sunday, the Social Safety Administration despatched an electronic mail to its staff telling them that the OPM electronic mail is “a legit task” and those that obtained it have been required to reply.

Nonetheless, the company adopted up on Monday afternoon telling staff that any response is “voluntary.”

“Non-responses are usually not thought-about a resignation,” the e-mail mentioned.

NASA

NASA emailed its staff on Monday afternoon saying, “You aren’t required to reply, and there’s no impression in your employment with the company when you select to not reply.”

The company mentioned it might reply on staff’ behalf and that “staff ought to proceed to really feel empowered to report their actions and accomplishments” to their supervisors.

Division of Justice

Jolene Ann Lauria, appearing assistant legal professional common for administration on the DOJ, emailed staff on Monday: “Because of the confidential and delicate nature of the Division’s work, DOJ staff don’t want to reply to the e-mail from OPM.”

Bloomberg Regulation reported that this was a reversal of Lauria’s earlier steerage that instructed staff to reply to the e-mail.

Division of Agriculture

The USDA informed staff on Monday afternoon that responding to the e-mail is “voluntary,” and that “there isn’t a penalty for not responding to the request.”

The USDA steerage mentioned that those that do select to reply ought to chorus from submitting any delicate or confidential info.

State Division

The State Division informed staff that it might reply on behalf of the company.

“No worker is obligated to report their actions exterior of their Division chain of command,” the division mentioned.

Division of Vitality

The Division of Vitality emailed its staff on Sunday evening, instructing them to “pause” any responses to the OPM electronic mail.

“The Division of Vitality is chargeable for reviewing the efficiency of its personnel and can conduct any assessment in accordance with its personal procedures,” the division mentioned. “When and if required, the Division will present a coordinated response to the OPM electronic mail.”

Division of Well being and Human Companies

The Division of Well being and Human Companies informed staff that based mostly on discussions with OPM officers, they didn’t want to reply to the preliminary electronic mail.

“OPM has now rescinded that obligatory requirement,” HHS mentioned in an electronic mail. “There isn’t any HHS expectation that HHS staff reply to OPM and there’s no impression to your employment with the company when you select to not reply.”

The e-mail mentioned that those that do reply ought to achieve this “at a excessive stage of generality” and shield delicate info. They need to “assume that what you write can be learn by malign international actors and tailor your response accordingly.”

Are you a federal employee? Bought a tip? Contact these reporters securely on Sign on the usernames asheffey.97 or alicetecotzky.05, or electronic mail them at asheffey@businessinsider.com or atecotzky@insider.com.